“Corporate crime” is practically an oxymoron in America. While it’s true that the single most consequential and profligate theft in America is wage theft, its mechanisms are so obscure and, well, dull that it’s easy to sell us on the false impression that the real problem is shoplifting:
Corporate crime is often hidden behind Dana Clare’s Shield Of Boringness, cloaked in euphemisms like “risk and compliance” or that old favorite, “white collar crime”:
And corporate crime has a kind of performative complexity. The crimes come to us wreathed in specialized jargon and technical terminology that make them hard to discern. Which is wild, because corporate crimes occur on a scale that other crimes – even those committed by organized crime – can’t hope to match:
But anything that can’t go on forever eventually stops. After decades of official tolerance (and even encouragement), corporate criminals are finally in the crosshairs of federal enforcers. Take National Labor Relations Board general counsel Jennifer Abruzzo’s ruling in Cemex: when a company takes an illegal action to affect the outcome of a union election, the consequence is now automatic recognition of the union:
That’s a huge deal. Before, a boss could fire union organizers and intimidate workers, scuttle the union election, and then, months or years later, pay a fine and some back-wages…and the union would be smashed.
Muslims across Canada say the current political climate is dangerous for young people from Muslim backgrounds, in light of heated protests and statements last month over schools teaching gender identity.
The joke is that “there are more molecules in a single glass of water than stars in the galaxy” is a common thing to say. So the reader immediately sees “hydrogens in a single molecule of water” and assumes that the writer of the statement has made a mistake. It can take a few readings before noticing that the writer said “stars in the solar system” and not the expected “galaxy”, the writer was correct all along, it is us who is the fool. Such fun.
I just think that ‘animals are living intelligent creatures that have feelings and deserve to be respected’ and 'when done properly farming is beneficial to both people and animals and there’s nothing wrong with raising and killing animals for food, clothing, and other products’ are concepts that very much can and should coexist
